|
|
Post by nikejumpman23 on Nov 30, 2005 15:55:17 GMT -5
The Bobcats had 15 fastbreak points Kings had 5. Bobcats had 54 points in the paint and kings had only 38. The Bobcats also outrebounded the Kings by 4, and had More bench points than the Kings. Surprisingly the Kings won by 18 points, the only reason i can think of that the kings won is by shooting 50% While the Bobcats shot slightly over 40%. Bibby had 25 points. Brad Miller had 20 points. Peja had only 5 points The Kings are not in 4th place in the Pacific with a 7-7 record.
|
|
|
|
Post by Change on Nov 30, 2005 17:28:29 GMT -5
The reason why the Kings won by such a large margin in my opinion is that Charlotte didn't play Sacramento on defense the right way. You pointed out how the Bobcats had more inside points than the Kings and that right there is the problem. The Kings are an outside team and when you hound them on the perimeter they crumble. See what Gerald Wallace did to Peja? If the whole team had grasped that concept and played more sticky 1 on 1 defense than I could have seen it be a much closer game. To emphasis my point on how bad they played the perimeter, the kings shot 10-14 from 3.
I think the Bobcats played sloppy on offense against a poor defensive squad in the Kings. They weren't pounding it into Emeka enough and they shot just 40% from the field.
A good win for the Kings, but the Bobcats could have played better, much better.
|
|
